![]() ![]() Rather, Psychopathology of everyday life is worth reading for the glimpses it provides into Freud's creative genius. But in our time no one would read Freud for insights into scientific methodology. ![]() Its conclusions are based on anecdotal evidence and the supposedly latent unconscious wishes are analyzed and inferred through interviews or introspection. Some modern findings in neuroscience even go as far as suggesting that our will and conscious I are nothing more than illusions - an illusion that must be the ultimate deception.įrom a scientific point of view, Psychopathology of everyday life is simply bad work. ![]() What's surprising is that he got the big picture right unconscious (orĪs they're called today) process do control much of our emotions and acts. With the obvious advantage of 100 years of scientific progress, it's easy to tell that Freud was completely wrong in the details. I write "apparently" because Freud's psychology was based on the idea that these innocent slips represented "unwelcome, repressed, psychic material, which, though pushed away from consciousness, is nevertheless not robbed of all capacity to express itself". The book is built around lots of small anecdotes of apparently innocent and insignificant everyday events like the forgetting of names, misspellings and slips of the tongue. Psychopathology follows in the steps of its one year older relative, The Psychopathology of everyday life may well be Sigmund Freud's most accessible work. Psychopathology of everyday life by Sigmund Freud ![]()
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |